References :

Author (2010) Author (2013) Author (2014) Author 1 & Author 2 (2013) Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215-241. doi:10.1016/S1060- 3743(99)80115-5 Berliner, D., & Casanova, U. (1998). Peer tutoring: A new look at a popular practice. Instructor, 97, 14-15. Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In A. Mackey, & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58-89). New York, NY: Routledge. Canagarajah, S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 401-417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01207.x Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross- cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 17- 30. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5 Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. De Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 484-496. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540- 4781.1994.tb02065.x De Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68. DOI: 10.1111/0026-7902.00052 Donato, R. (2004). Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 284-302. DOI: 10.1017/s026719050400011X Eisenstein Ebsworth, M. (2014). The many faces of feedback on writing: A historical perspective. Writing and Pedagogy, 6(2), 195-221. DOI: 10.1558/wap.v6i2.195 Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity- theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy. Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445-463. DOI: 10.1177/1362168810375367 Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402-430. DOI: 10.1093/applin/ami014 Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-375. DOI: 10.1093/applin/21.3.354 García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. García, O. & L. Wei. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004) Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31. Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 143- 162. DOI: 10.1080/01411920902894070 Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second languageacquisition. Journal of second language writing, 11(4), 329-350. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00091-7 Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 185-212. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8 Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444806003399 Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.) Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. Language Learning, 45(4), 1-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x MacArthur, C. A. (2007). Best practices in teaching evaluation and revision. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 141–162). New York, NY: Guilford. Mendonça, C. O., & Johnson, K.E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 28, 745–769. DOI: 10.2307/3587558 Mercer, N. (2000) Words and Minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analyzing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168. DOI: 10.1558/japl/v1.i2.137 Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 12-21. DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001 Min, H-T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 Min, H-T. (2008). Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 285- 305. DOI:10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.002 Moll, L. (2010). Mobilizing Culture, Language, and Educational Practices: Fulfilling the Promises of Mendez and Brown. Educational Researcher. 39(6), 451–460. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X10380654 Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135–142. DOI: 10.2307/3586965 Palmer, D. K., Martínez, R. A., Mateus, S. G., & Henderson, K. (2014). Reframing the debate on language separation: Toward a vision for translanguaging pedagogies in the dual language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 757-772. DOI: 10.1111/modl.12121 Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Olson, C. B., Kim, J. S., Scarcella, R., Kramer, J., Pearson, M., van Dyk, D. A., Collins, P. and Land, R. E. (2012) Enhancing the interpretive reading and analytical writing of mainstreamed English learners in secondary school: Results from a randomized field trial using a cognitive strategies approach. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2): 323–355. DOI: 10.3102/0002831212439434 Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), 265- 289. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9 Rijlaarsdam, G., & Couzijn, M. (2000). Writing and learning to write: A double challenge. In New learning (pp. 157-189). Springer Netherlands. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be more effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 217- 233. DOI:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9 Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27(3), 363-374. DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00031-7 Storch, N. (2001). Comparing ESL learners’ attention to grammar on three different collaborative tasks. RELC Journal, 32, 104- 124. DOI: 10.1177/003368820103200207 Storch, N. (2002). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 305-322. DOI:10.1016/S0883- 0355(03)00007-7 Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of second language writing, 14(3), 153-173. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95-114. DOI: 10.1080/09658410802146644 Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.) Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). New York, NY: Continuum. Swain, M., & Deters, P. (2007). “New” mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. The Modern Language Journal, 91(s1), 820-836. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00671.x Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337. DOI: 10.2307/329959 Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251-274. DOI: 10.1177/136216880000400304 Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.) Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). New York, NY: Routledge. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304. DOI:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5 Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190502000090 Tang, G. M., & Tithecott, J. (1999). Peer response in ESL writing. TESL Canada Journal, 16(2), 20–38. Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9 van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological persprective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 245- 259). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51-75. DOI:10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6 Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 491- 514. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.4.491 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wei, L. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1222-1235. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035 Wei, L. (2014). Negotiating funds of knowledge and symbolic competence in the complementary school classrooms. Language and Education, 28(2), 161-180. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2013.800549 Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004