‘It definitely should… if you had kind of an ideal service’: Exploring links between reflective talk and ethical identities within the speech and language therapy community
Issue: Vol 7 No. 2 (2016) Professional Identity in speech and language therapy: Contexts and constructions
Journal: Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders
Subject Areas: Linguistics
Abstract:
It has been suggested that reflective practice is a fundamentally ethical process (Bolton, 2014). Intuitively, this statement seems convincing. However, the author was interested in exploring this issue empirically in the context of the Speech and Language Therapist (SLT) identity. Data was gathered during focus groups with SLTs and also during one to one interviews with SLTs and speech and language therapy educators. During these focus groups and interviews, participants were facilitated in reflecting on some of their professional (i.e. clinical and educational) practices. Transcripts were then analysed, focusing in particular on modality (Palmer, 2001; Rocci, 2009) and footing (Goffman, 1981), with a view to exploring both reflection and ethics in relation to SLT identity. Ethical talk was found to be embedded within the reflective discourse studied. Analysis uncovered ethical facets of institutional identities emergent during the reflective talk of SLTs and educators. Reflection, as a discursive activity, is a complex and multi-layered process. While reflecting on their professional practice members of the speech and language therapy community also ‘do’ identity work. This analysis suggests that ethical facets of professional identity are, in part, constructed and maintained vis-à-vis reflective talk. The potential for reflection to be used as a tool for supporting healthcare professionals, such as SLTs, to nurture ethical identities deserves further investigation. The importance of infusing ethics into everyday clinical thinking and action is also discussed.
Author: Sinéad Kellaghan
References :
Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., and Schiffrin, S. (2011). Discourse and identity construction. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles (eds). Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, 177–200. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8
Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. (2008). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (6th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benwell, B. M. and Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Body, R. and McAllister, L. (2009). Ethics in Speech and Language Therapy. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Bolton, G. (2014). Reflective Practice: Writing for Professional Development (4th edn). London: Sage.
Chabon, S., Morris, J., and Lemoncello, R. (2011). Ethical deliberation: A foundation for evidence-based practice. Seminars in Speech and Language 32 (4): 298–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1292755
CORU (2014). Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics for Speech and Language Therapists: Dublin: CORU Speech and Language Therapists Registration Board.
Council for Clinical Certification in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2013). Standards for the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Speech-Language Pathology. Retrieved on 31 August 2014 from http://www.asha.org/Certification/2014-Speech-Language-Pathology-Certification-Standards.
Cowley, C. (2005). The dangers of medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31 (12): 739–742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.011908
Damico, J. S. and Simmons-Mackie, N. S. (2003). Qualitative research and speech-language pathology: A tutorial for the clinical realm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12 (2): 131–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/060)
De Fina, A. (2013) Discourse and Identity. In C. A. Chapelle (ed.) The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics Volume III, 1729–1734. Chichester: Blackwell.
Drew, P. and Sorjonen, M. L. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2), 92–118. London: Sage.
Duchan, J. F. (1998). Reports written by speech-language pathologists: The role of agenda in constructing client competence. In J. F. Duchan, M. Maxwell, and D. Kovarsky (eds), Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction, 223–244. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Duchan, J. F. (2005). The diagnostic practices of speech-language pathologists. In J. F. Duchan and D. Kovarsky (eds), Diagnosis as Cultural Practice, 201–222. New York: Moutin de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110199802.201
Ferguson, A. and Armstrong, E. (2004). Reflections on speech and language therapists' talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39 (4): 469–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1368282042000226879
Gardiner, P. (2003). A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29 (5), 297–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.297
Geller, E. and Foley, G. M. (2009a). Broadening the ‘ports of entry’ for speech-language pathologists: A relational and reflective model for clinical supervision. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18 (1): 22–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0053)
Geller, E. and Foley, G. M. (2009b). Expanding the ‘ports of entry’ for speech-language pathologists: A relational and reflective model for clinical practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18 (1): 4–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0054)
Ghaye, T. (2000) Into the reflective mode: Bridging the stagnant moat. Reflective Practice, 1 (1): 5–9.
Gillon, R. (2003). Four scenarios. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29 (5): 267–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.267
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harris, J. (2003). In praise of unprincipled ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29 (5): 303–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.303
Hill, A. E., Davidson, B. J., and Theodoros, D. G. (2012). Reflections on clinical learning in novice speech–language therapy students. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47 (4): 413–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00154.x
Huxtable, R. (2013). For and against the four principles of biomedical ethics. Clinical Ethics 8 (2/3): 39–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477750913486245
Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., and Winslade, W. J. (2010) Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine (7th edn). New York: McGraw Hill.
Kenny, B. J., Lincoln, M., Blyth, K., and Balandin, S. (2009). Ethical perspective on quality of care: The nature of ethical dilemmas identified by new graduate and experienced speech pathologists. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44 (4): 421–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13682820902928711
Kenny, B., Lincoln, M., and Balandin, S. (2010). Experienced speech-language pathologists' responses to ethical dilemmas: An integrated approach to ethical reasoning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19 (2): 121–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0007)
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kovarsky, D. and Duchan, J. F. (1997). The interactional dimensions of language therapy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28 (3): 297–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2803.297
Kovarsky, D., Kimbarow, M., and Kastner, D. (1998). The construction of incompetence during group therapy with traumatically brain injured adults. In J. F. Duchan, M. Maxwell, and D. Kovarsky (eds), Constructing (In)competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction, 291–311. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kovarsky, D., Schiemer, C. and Murray, A. (2011). Humor, rapport, and uncomfortable moments in interactions with adults with traumatic brain injury. Topics in Language Disorders, 31 (4): 325–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3182358e98
Kummer, A. W. and Turner, J. (2011). Ethics in the practice of speech-language pathology in health care settings. Seminars in Speech and Language 32 (4): 330–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1292758
Leahy, M. M. and Walsh, I. P. (2008). Talk in interaction in the speech-language pathology clinic: Bringing theory to practice through discourse. Topics in Language Disorders, 28 (3): 229–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000333598.53339.5a
McAllister, L., Rose, M., Higgs, J., and Jones, M. (2000). Speech-language pathology students: Learning clinical reasoning. In J. Higgs and M. A. Jones (eds), Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions (2nd edn), 205–213. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
McLeod-Sordjan, R. (2014). Evaluating moral reasoning in nursing education. Nursing Ethics 21 (4): 473–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733013505309
Moon, J. A. (2000). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Mowles, C., van der Gaag, A., and Fox, J. (2010). The practice of complexity: Review, change and service improvement in an NHS department. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 24 (2): 127–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777261011047318
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178
Rocci, A. (2009). Doing discourse analysis with possible worlds In J. Renkema (ed.), Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. (1996). Communicating Quality 3: Professional Standards for Speech and Language Therapists. London: Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.
Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S. (2005) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226651
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Seedhouse, D. (2002). Commitment to health: A shared ethical bond between professions. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16 (3): 249–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820220146685
Seedhouse, D. (2014). Ethics: The Heart of Healthcare (3rd edn). Chicester: Wiley.
Sellars, M. (2014). Reflective Practice for Teachers. London: Sage.
Simmons-Mackie, N. and Damico, J. S. (2011). Counselling and aphasia treatment: Missed opportunities. Topics in Language Disorders, 31 (4): 336–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318234ea9f
Speech Pathology Association of Australia (2010). Code of Ethics. Melbourne: The Speech Pathology Association of Australia.
Standing Liaison Committee of EU Speech and Language Therapists (2009). A Framework for Ethical Practice in Speech and Language Therapy. Retrieved on 11 September 2014 from http://www.cplol.eu/eng/ethical_practice.html.
Stedmon, J. and Dallos, R. (2009). Flying over the swampy lowlands: Reflective and reflexive practice. In J. Stedmon and R. Dallos (eds) Reflective Practice in Psychotherapy and Counselling, 1–22. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
Thornton, T. (2006). Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32 (6): 365–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.012518
Walsh, I. P. (2007). Small talk is ‘Big Talk’ in clinical discourse: Appreciating the value of conversation in SLP clinical interactions. Topics in Language Disorders, 27 (1): 24–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200701000-00004
Wetherell, M. (2011). Themes in discourse research: The case of Diana. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates. (eds), Discourse, Theory and Practice: A Reader, 14–28. London: Sage.
Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analytic investigations of dysarthria and hearing impairment: The impact of motor and sensory impairments in social interaction. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4 (1): 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v4i1.1