Explicit focus on meaning: Mindful conceptual engagement in the second language classroom
Journal: Language and Sociocultural Theory
Against the backdrop of discussions in instructed SLA concerning form-focused versus meaning-focused L2 instruction, a framework we refer to as Mindful Conceptual Engagement (MCE) is proposed as a feature of Vygotskian concept-based instruction. In this paper, specific attention is given to the pragmatic relevance of ser/estar in Spanish discourse. The implementation of the MCE approach to teaching concepts starts with the development of pedagogical materials for the teaching of communicative issues, in this case, normativity. It also requires active engagement by learners in reflective activities, such as the creation of their own conceptual representations as a learning tool to understand ser/estar through the notion of normativity. Data from beginning L2 Spanish learners are presented to illustrate how engaging them in the production of different kinds of graphic representations and verbalizations promotes the internalization of complex grammatical concepts with practical functionality in L2 communication. It is argued that by promoting active reflection and engagement with communicative issues using the concept of normativity, MCE enabled learners to begin to appreciate the pragmatic significance of the concept as expressed in ser/estar.
Author: Eduardo Negueruela-Azarola, Antoni Fernandez Parera
Andrade, M., Egasse, J. Muñoz, E. M., and Cabrera-Puche, M. (2013). Tu mundo: español sin fronteras (1st Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Aquilo-Mora, F. A., and Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2015). Motion for the other through motion for the self: The conceptual complexities of giving-directions for advanced Spanish heritage learners. In A. Labarca, C. Arnett, and K. Masuda (Eds) Cognitive Linguistics and Sociocultural Theory: Applications for Second and Foreign Language Teaching, 73–100. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.
Blyth, Carl. (1997). A constructivist approach to grammar: Teaching teachers to teach aspect. The Modern Language Journal 81: 50–66.
Bodrova, E. and Leong D. J. (2007). Tools of the Mind. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson. https:/doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01626.x
Bolinger, D. L. (1944). More on ‘Ser’ and ‘Estar’. The Modern Language Journal 28: 233–238.
Bolinger, D. L. (1973). Essence and accident: English analogs of Hispanic ser-estar. In B. B. Kachru (Ed) Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renee Kahane, 58–69. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Bull, W. E. (1965). Spanish for Teachers: Applied Linguistics. New York: Ronald Press.
Bull, W. E. (1942). New principles for some Spanish equivalents of ‘to be’. Hispania 25: 433–443. https:/doi.org/10.2307/334262
Bull, W. E. (1965). A Visual Grammar of Spanish. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Department of Spanish.
Clements, J. C. (1988). The semantics and pragmatics of the Spanish < copula+adjective> construction. Linguistics 26: 779–822. https:/doi.org/10.1515/ling.19188.8.131.529
Dansereau, D. (1987). A discussion of techniques used in the teaching of the passé composé/imparfait distinction in French. French Review: 33–38.
Franco, F. and Steinmetz D. (1983). Ser y estar+ adjetivo calificativo en español. Hispania 66: 176–184. https:/doi.org/10.2307/341394
Gal’perin, P. (1989). Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology 27 (3): 65–82. https:/doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405270365
Gal’perin, P. (1992a). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 30 (4): 60–80. https:/doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300460
Gal’perin, P. (1992b). The problem of activity in Soviet psychology. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 30 (4): 37–59. https:/doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300437
Gili Gaya, S. (1973). Vox curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibliograf.
Haenen, J. (1996). Piotr Gal’perin: Psychologist in Vygotsky’s Footsteps. New York: Nova Science.
Hall, J. K. (2002) Methods for Teaching Foreign Languages: Creating a Community of Learners in the Classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Hubbard, P. L. (1994). Non-transformational theories of grammar: Implications for language teaching. In T. Odlin (Ed.) Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar, 49–71. London: Cambrdge University Press. https:/doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524605.005
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. and Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, 1–32. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Luján, M. (1981). The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua 54 (2): 165–210. https:/doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(81)90068-1
Montalvo, I. B. (2013). Aspect and Visualization of the Spanish Copulas Ser and Estar. Unpublished undergraduate honor thesis. University of Miami. Miami, FL.
Navas Ruiz, R. (1963). Ser y estar. El sistema atributivo del español. Salamanca: Almar.
Negueruela, E. (2003). A Sociocultural Approach to the Teaching-Learning of Second Languages: Systemic-Theoretical Instruction and L2 Development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA.
Negueruela Azarola, E. (2008a). A conceptual approach to promoting L2 grammatical development: Implications for language program directors. In L. K. Stacey and W. T. Johanna (Eds) Conceptions of L2 Grammar: Theoretical Approaches and their Application in the L2 Classroom, 151–171. Boston, MA: Heinle.
Negueruela Azarola, E. (2008b). Revolutionary pedagogies: Learning that leads (to) second language development. In J.P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (Eds) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 189–227. London: Equinox.
Negueruela Azarola, E. (2013). Metaliguistic knowledge becoming intrapsychological tools. Concepts as tools for second language development. In K. Roehr and G. A. Gánem-Gutiérrez The Metalinguistic Dimension in Instructed Second Language Learning, 221–242. London: Bloomsbury.
Negueruela, E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In R. Salaberry and B. Lafford (Eds) The Art of Teaching Spanish: Second Language Acquisition from Research to Praxis, 79–102. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Roby, D. B. (2009). Aspect and the Categorization of States: The Case of ser and estar in Spanish. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. https:/doi.org/10.1075/slcs.114
Savignon, S. J. (1997). Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Serrano-Lopez, M. and Poehner, M. E. (2008). Materializing linguistic concepts through 3-D clay modeling: A tool-and-result approach to mediating L2 Spanish development. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (Eds) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 321–350. London: Equinox.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (Eds) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Compernolle, R. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and L2 Instructional Pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language (Newly revised and edited by Alex Kozulin). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Whitley, M. S. (2002). Spanish/English Contrasts: A Course in Spanish Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Whitley, M. S. and Lunn, P. V. (2010). Teaching Spanish Grammar with Pictures: How to use William Bull’s Visual Grammar of Spanish. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Woolsey, D. (2006). Development of learner use of ‘estar+adjective’ in contexts of comparison within an individual frame of reference. In N. Sagarra and A. J. Toribio (Eds) Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 180–191. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Zhang, X., and Lantolf, J. P. (2015). Natural or artificial? Testing the Teachability Hypothesis, Language Learning, 65, 152–180. https:/doi.org/10.1111/lang.12094