Creating accounts of diverse developmental writing paths within a Colombian major in industrial engineering
Issue: Vol 10 No. 3 (2018) Special Issue: Writing across the Lifespan
Journal: Writing & Pedagogy
Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics
DOI: 10.1558/wap.34588
Abstract:
This paper describes developmental writing paths within a Colombian major in Industrial Engineering. The accounts were created through retrospective descriptions of students' writing experiences collected by a qualitative survey and analyzing writing samples. The study shows that writing throughout the major embraces diverse functions (Writing to learn; Writing to apply content knowledge; Writing to research; Writing to communicate ideas), and traces diverse developmental paths (Writing for innovation; Lab writing; Writing for company analysis; Writing for conducting a senior thesis). This analysis also reveals that different types of problems (improving profits in companies or creating new devices) can be treated through different types of genres (research proposals in companies and projects of innovation), despite the fact that the same label (report) is being used by participants to group writing experiences. One of the writing functions in the major that seems overtly identified by the students is conducting a senior thesis. Since there are other writing functions present across the curriculum, further studies and pedagogical debates with faculty members are necessary to define what writing developmental paths are expected from the students and how many curriculum projects (that include explicit teaching on theories of disciplinary writing and genre knowledge) across the curriculum should be undertaken.
Author: Elizabeth Narvaez
References :
Arciniegas, E. and López, G. S. (2012). La escritura en el aula universitaria: estrategias para su regulación. Santiago de Cali, Colombia: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle.
Artemeva, N. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their profession. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, and D. Figueiredo, Genre in a Changing World. Perspectives on Writing. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
Artemeva, N. and Fox, J. (2010). Awareness versus production: Probing students’ antecedent genre knowledge. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24 (4), 476–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651910371302
Beaufort, A. (1999). Writing in the Real World: Making the Transition from School to Work. New York: Teachers College Press.
Beaufort, A. (2008). College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt4cgnk0
Blake, K. (2015). Writers’ histories, Processes, and Identities Vary. In L. Adler-Kassner and E. Wardle (Eds), Naming What we Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies, 52–54. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brent, D. (2012). Crossing boundaries: Co-op students relearning to write. College Composition and Communication, 63 (4), 558–592.
Carroll, L. A. (2002). Rehearsing New Roles: How College Students Develop as Writers. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.
Carter, M., Ferzli, M., and Wiebe, E. N. (2007). Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21 (3), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907300466
Coutinho, M. A. and Miranda, F. (2009). To describe genres: Problems and strategies. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, and D. Figueiredo (Eds), Genre in a Changing World. Perspectives on Writing. 35–55. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
Dias, P. and Paré, A. (Eds). (2000). Transitions: Writing in Academic and Workplace Settings. Bridgewater, NJ: Hampton Press.
Flórez Romero, R., Baquero Castellanos, S., and Sánchez Navas, L. A. (2010). Desarrollo de habilidades en el español escrito en personas sordas universitarias: estudio de caso. Forma y Función, 23 (2), 33–71.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary Discourses, Michigan Classics Ed.: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6719
ILEES English. (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2015, from http://english.ilees.org/
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lerner, N. (2009). The Idea of a Writing Laboratory. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.
López, J., Stella, G., and Ramírez Giraldo, R. (2012). Los resúmenes como estrategia de aprendizaje. Lenguaje, 40 (2), 315–350.
Martínez, M. C., Álvarez, D. I., Hernández, F., Zapata, F., and Castillo, L. C. (2004). Discurso y aprendizaje. Cali, Cátedra UNESCO.
Narváez-Cardona. (2016). Latin-American Writing Initiatives in Engineering from Spanish-speaking Countries. Ilha do Desterro, 69 (3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n3p223
Nesi, H. and Gardner, S. (2012). Genres Across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nowacek, R. S. (2011). Agents of Integration: Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical Act. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.
Poe, M., Lerner, N., and Craig, J. (2010). Learning to Communicate in Science and Engineering: Case Studies from MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reiff, M. J. and Bawarshi, A. (2011). Tracing discursive resources: How students use prior genre knowledge to negotiate new writing contexts in first-year composition. Written Communication, 28 (3), 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311410183
Rounsaville, A. (2012). Selecting genres for transfer: The role of uptake in students’ antecedent genre knowledge. Composition Forum (Vol. 26). Association of Teachers of Advanced Composition.
Stillar G. F. (1998). Analyzing Everyday Texts: Discourse, Rhetoric, and Social Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Swarts, J. and Odell, L. (2001). Rethinking the evaluation of writing in engineering courses. Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual (Vol. 1: T3A-25). IEEE.
Yancey, K. Robertson, L. and Tackzac, K. (2014). The role of curricular design in transfer. In K. Yancey, L. Robertson and K. Tackzac Writing across Contexts: Transfer, Composition, and Sites of Writing, 37–60. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrr95.5