Item Details

What Is the Relationship of Spencerian, Durkheimian and Marxian Natural Selections to Darwinian Natural Selection and How Can We Formalize Their Mutual Interaction?

Issue: Vol 4 No. 1 (2016) Special Issue on Evolutionary Theories of Religion

Journal: Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Cognitive Studies Linguistics

DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.35728

Abstract:

What Is the Relationship of Spencerian, Durkheimian and Marxian Natural Selections to Darwinian Natural Selection and How Can We Formalize Their Mutual Interaction?

Author: Radek Kundt

View Original Web Page

References :

Atran, S. 2001. “The Trouble with Memes.” Human Nature 12(4): 351–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-001-1003-0

Claidière, N. and J. B. André. 2012. “The Transmission of Genes and Culture: A Questionable Analogy.” Evolutionary Biology 39(1): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-011-9141-8

Claidière, N., T. C. Scott-Phillips and D. Sperber. 2014. “How Darwinian Is Cultural Evolution?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130368. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0368

Claidière, N. and D. Sperber. 2007. “The Role of Attraction in Cultural Evolution.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 7(1): 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853707X171829

Edmonds, B. 2005. “The Revealed Poverty of the Gene-Meme Analogy: Why Memetics per se Has Failed to Produce Substantive Results.” Journal of Memetics. Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission 9(1). https://cfpm.org/jom-emit/2005/vol9/edmonds_b.html

Gardner, A. 2008. “The Price Equation.” Current Biology 18(5): 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.005

Kundt, R. 2015. Contemporary Evolutionary Theories of Culture and the Study of Religion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Morin, O. 2016a. How Traditions Live and Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2016b. “Reasons to Be Fussy about Cultural Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy 31(3): 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9516-4

Pinker, S. 2012. “The False Allure of Group Selection.” Edge.org. (Retrieved June 2012) http://edge.org/conversation/the-false-allure-of-group-selection#edn1

Price, G. R. 1970. “Selection and Covariance.” Nature 227(5257): 520–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/227520a0

———. 1972. “Extension of Covariance Selection Mathematics.” Annals of Human Genetics 35(4): 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1957.tb01874.x

Scott-Phillips, T. C. 2017. “A (Simple) Experimental Demonstration that Cultural Evolution Is Not Replicative, but Reconstructive: And an Explanation of Why This Difference Matters.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 17(1–2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342188

Sperber, D. 2000. “An Objection to the Memetic Approach to Culture. In Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, edited by R. Aunger, 163–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sterelny, K. and P. E. Griffiths 1999. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Williams, G. C. 1992. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.