Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. The Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/paper/11063/

ACTFL. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012

Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal 78 (4): 465–483.

Ammar, A. and Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28 (4): 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1039/c005380p

Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals 42 (3): 576–598.

Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education. Retrieved on 10 September 2017 from https://www.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-Beyond-the-Black-Box.pdf.

Davin, K. J. (2016). Classroom dynamic assessment: A critical examination of constructs and practices. Modern Language Journal 100 (4): 813–829.

Davin, K. J. (2013). Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 17 (3): 303–322.

Davin, K. J. and Donato, R. (2013). Student collaboration and teacher‐directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals 46 (1): 5–22.

Davin, K. J., Troyan, F. J., and Hellmann, A. (2014). Classroom dynamic assessment of reading comprehension with second language learners. Language and Sociocultural Theory 1 (1): 1–23.

Bender, W. N. (2009). Beyond the RTI Pyramid: Implementation Issues for the First Five Years. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Bender, W. N. and Shores, C. (2007). Response to Intervention: A Practical Guide for Every Teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Carroll, S. (1989). Second language acquisition and the computational paradigm. Language Learning 39: 535–594.

Cho, E., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., and Bouton, B. (2014). Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to tier 2 intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities 47 (5): 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412466703

Davison, C., and Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly 43 (3): 393–415.

Dewaele, J. M., and Veronique, D. (2001). Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: A cross-sectional study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 275–296.

Escandón, A., and Sanz, M. (2011). The bottom-up move within Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: A pedagogical application for teaching agreement in Spanish as a foreign language. RELC Journal 42 (3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211421662

Fuchs, D. and Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly 41 (1): 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4

Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Hollenbeck, K. N., Craddock, C. F., and Hamlett, C. L. (2008). Dynamic assessment of algebraic learning in predicting third graders’ development of mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (4): 829–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012657

Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children 39: 14–20.

Gal’perin, P. I. (1989). Mental actions as a basis for the formation of thoughts and images. Soviet Psychology 27 (2): 45–64.

Gal’perin, P. I. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 30: 60–80.

Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: Two sides of one coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities 42 (2): 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326207

Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological Tools: A Sociocultural Approach to Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kozulin, A. (2009). New reference points for dynamic assessment (DA): A commentary on Karpov and Tzuriel. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 8 (3): 242–245. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945

Kozulin, A. and Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International 23 (1): 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733

Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, 24–47. New York: Routledge.

Lantolf, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass and A. Mackey (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 57–72. New York: Routledge.

Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research 15 (1): 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328

Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Montrul, S. and Potowski, K. (2007). Command of gender agreement n school-age Spanish-English Bilingual Children. International Journal of Bilingualism 11 (3): 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069070110030301

National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (NSFLEP). (2006). National Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.

Negueruela-Azarola, E., García, P. N. and Buescher, K. (2015). From interaction to intra-action: The internalization of talk, gesture, and concepts in the second language classroom. In N. Markee (Ed.), The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction, 233–249. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal 91 (3): 323–340.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Berlin: Springer.

Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly 43 (3): 471–491.

Regalla, M. and Peker, H. (2017). Prompting all students to learn: Examining dynamic assessment of special needs and typical students in a prekindergarten inclusive French program. Foreign Language Annals 50 (2): 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12261

Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Wagner, R. K. and Compton, D. L. (2011). Dynamic assessment and its implications for RTI models. Journal of Learning Disabilities 44 (4): 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411407859

White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M. and Leung, Y.-K. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics 25 (2004): 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001067

Williams, L., Abraham, L. B. and Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2013). Using concept-based instruction in the L2 classroom: Perspectives from current and future language teachers. Language Teaching Research 17 (3): 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482950