Item Details

Joining Forces Toward Social Inclusion : Language MOOC Design for Refugees and Migrants through the Lens of Maker Culture

Issue: Vol 38 No. 1 (2021) Innovation and Creation: The Maker Movement

Journal: CALICO Journal

Subject Areas:

DOI: 10.1558/cj.40900


The expansion of MOOCs (massive open online courses) is very much associated with instructors interested in the craft of teaching, innovating, and experimenting with different methods to improve and expand students’ learning experience. The Erasmus+ project MOONLITE has worked to create cross-institutional scenarios and new educational pathways for migrants and refugees, devising, among other things, two Spanish language MOOCs (LMOOCs). They are the product of the joint efforts of university academics, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and refugee support groups (RSGs), together with volunteers, refugees, and migrants, who formed a community in order to design courses that effectively addressed the needs of refugees and migrants arriving in Spain. Using a design thinking process, all parties involved attempted to collaboratively identify strategies and solutions to a given problem that might not be obvious upon first inspection; in this case, the specific linguistic needs of migrants and refugees arriving in a new country. Results show that this continuum of academics— NGOs/RSGs—volunteers—refugees/migrants was highly effective for the learners, with an overall completion rate in both MOOCs of 96%. The participants’ perception is that these MOOCs helped them in their goal of integrating into life in Spain in key situations, such as communicating in a job interview or understanding the process of looking for accommodation and completing bureaucratic procedures.

Author: Maria Dolores Castrillo, Beatriz Sedano

View Original Web Page

References :

Aman, M. & Santandreu, D. (2019). Frugal MOOCs: An Adaptable Contextualized Approach to MOOC Designs for Refugees. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 1-19. DOI:

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. DOI:

Barcena, E. (in press). Inclusive Language MOOCs.

Barcena, E., & Martín-Monje, E. (2014). Language MOOCs: An Emerging Field. In E. Martín-Monje & E. Barcena (eds.) Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries. Warsaw: De Gruyter, 1-15.

Author (in press).

Basu, R. R., Banerjee, P. M., & Sweeny, E. G. (2013). Frugal innovation. Journal of Management for Global sustainability, 1(2), 63-82. DOI:

Bozkurt, A. & Aydin, C.H. (2015). Satisfaction, preferences and problems of a MOOC participants. In Simonson, M. (ed.) The Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) 2015 International Convention.

Castaño-Muñoz, J., Colucci, E., & Smidt, H. (2018). Free digital learning for inclusion of migrants and refugees in Europe: A qualitative analysis of three types of learning purposes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2). DOI:

Author (2017)

Chafkin, M. (2013, November 14). Udacity’s Sebastian Thrun, Godfather Of Free Online Education, Changes Course. Tech Forecast, Fastcompany. Retrieved from

Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why?. DOI:

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th. ed.). New York: Routledge.

Colucci, E., Castaño-Muñoz, J. C., & Devaux, A. (2017). MOOCs and Free Digital Learning for the inclusion of migrants and refugees: A European policy study.

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. DOI:

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design studies, 32(6), 521-532. DOI:

Dougherty, D. (2012). Dale Dougherty, Make. We are Makers. Retrieved from

European Commission (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Education in Emergencies and Protracted Crises

 Goldwasser, M., Mankoff, C., Manturuk, K., Schmid, L., & Whitfiled, K. (2016). Who is a Student: Completion in Coursera Courses at Duke University. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 3(1), 125-137.    

González-González, C., & Aller, L. G. (2018). Maker movement in education: maker mindset and makerspaces. Jornadas de HCI, IV.

Henderikx, A.M, Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017) Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353-368. DOI:

Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and Reality. Full report.

Lambert, S. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18. Computers & Education, 145, 103693. DOI:

Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24. DOI:

Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40-48. DOI:

 Neuböck, K., Kopp, M., & Ebner, M. (2015). What do we know about typical MOOC participants? First insights from the field. In eMOOCS 2015, 183-190.

Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The Ne York Times. Retrieved from

Author (2018)

Reich, J. (2015). Rebooting MOOC research: Improve assessment, data sharing, and experimental design. Science, 347(6217), 34-35. DOI:

Tovar, E. (2015). Who is taking European MOOCs and why? A large-scale, cross provider data collection about participants of European Open Online Courses. Proceedings of Open Education Global 2015:  Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

Author 2018.