Meaningful Integration in Professional Communities: Examining User Behaviors in Catalyst
Issue: (0) Advance Access
Journal: CALICO Journal
Online platforms have the potential to address the issue of world language teacher attrition by building professional learning communities. However, autonomous engagement is not guaranteed by the mere existence of said tools. In this article, we report findings from Catalyst user data analysis. Catalyst is an online professional development social portfolio that connects users to other professionals (in groups and as individuals). Specifically, we examine user behavior patterns in six areas-Group Membership, Goals, Evidence, Connections, Reflections, and Comments. Each feature was chosen because of its potential usefulness in facilitating meaningful and integrative participation in online professional platforms. Results reveal three behavior profiles: 1-Testers, 2-Dabblers, and 3-Embracers. Each profile exhibits unique behaviors of engagement with the portfolio. Users who did not join any group were much more likely to show the lowest level of activity (i.e., Testers), while those who were part of a group and had more connections (i.e., Embracers) demonstrated the highest level of activity. These results support the theoretical foundation for sociocultural approaches to professional learning for teachers (e.g., Kabilan et al., 2011; Kabilan & Kahn, 2012; Kitade, 2014) and highlight the critical, and mutually reciprocal, relationship between social engagement and cognitive development.
Author: Stephanie W. P. Knight, Julie M. Sykes, Linda Forrest, Carla H. Consolini, Johanna Jimenez
Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teacher's social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 42-66. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44046/1/10_01_arnoldducate.pdf
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2009). Assessing online collaboration among language teachers: A cross-institutional case study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 121-139.
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431-448. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.431-448
Attinello, J. R., Lare, D., & Waters, F. (2006). The value of teacher portfolios for evaluation and professional growth. NASSP Bulletin, 90(2), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636506288864
Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2
Ben-Bassat Levy, R., & Ben-Ari, M. (2007). We work so hard and they don't use it: Acceptance of software tools by teachers. Association for Computing Machinery SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(3), 246-250. https://doi.org/10.1145/1268784.1268856
Bustamante, C., & Moeller, A. J. (2013). The convergence of content, pedagogy, and technology in online professional development for teachers of German: An intrinsic case study. CALICO Journal, 30(1), 82-104. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.1.82-104
Chakrakodi, R. (2010). In-service teacher portfolios: Participant views on assessment. ELTED Journal, 13, 15-26.
Chao, C. (2006). How WebQuests send technology to the background: Scaffolding EFL teacher professional development in CALL. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher Education in CALL (vol. 14, pp. 220-234). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.19cha
Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. Systems, 22(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)90037-X
Confessore, G. J., & Park, E. (2004). Factor validation of the learner autonomy profile, version 3.0 and extraction of the short form. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 1(1), 39-58.
Cross, F. (2017). Teacher shortage areas nationwide listing: 1990-1991 through 2017-2018. Washington D.C.: Office of Postsecondary Education.
Cummins, P. W., & Davesne, C. (2009). Using electronic portfolios for second language assessment. Modern Language Journal, 93, 848-867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00977.x
Etscheidt, S., Curran, C. M., & Sawyer, C. M. (2012). Promoting reflection in teacher preparation programs: A multilevel model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411420887
Gan, B., Menkhoff, T., & Smith, R. (2015). Enhancing students' learning process through interactive digital media: New opportunities for collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 652-663. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2533; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.048
Germain-Rutherford, A. (2015). Online communities of practice: A professional development tool for language educators. In R. Hampel & U. Sticker (Eds.), Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices (pp. 113-133). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412263_8
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. M. (2010). Enhancing teacher performance: The role of professional autonomy. Interchange, 41(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-010-9106-3
Kabilan, M. K., & Khan, M. A. (2012). Assessing pre-service English language teachers' learning using e-portfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1007-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.011
Kabilan, M. K., Adlina, W. F., & Embi, M. A. (2011). Online collaboration of English language teachers for meaningful professional development experiences. English Teaching, 10(4), 94-115.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
Kessler, G. (2006). Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better? In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (vol. 14, pp. 23-42). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.05kes
Kitade, K. (2014). Second language teachers' identity development through online collaboration with L2 Learners. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.57-77
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product. Computers & Education, 40, 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9
McCarthy, T. (2011). Achieving your GOAL: A case study of three learners. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning (vol. 7, pp. 103-118). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888083640.003.0008
Moeller, A. J., Theiler, J. M., & Wu, C. (2012). Goal setting and student achievement: A longitudinal Study. Modern Language Journal, 96, 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01231.x
Novak, J. R., Herman, J. L., & Gearhart, M. (1996). Issues in portfolio assessment: The scorability of narrative collections. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles. https://doi.org/10.1037/e652162011-001
Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.854860
Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interactions: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-99.
Pena-Shaff, J., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003
Pires Pereira, I. S. (2014). Writing and the situated construction of teachers' cognition: Portfolios as complex performative spaces. Language and Education, 28(6), 521-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.908904
Poortvliet, P. M., & Darnon, C. (2010). Toward a more social understanding of achievement goals: The interpersonal effects of mastery and performance goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 324-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410383246
Robb, T. (2006). Helping teachers to help themselves. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (vol. 14, pp. 334-347). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.27rob
Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Russell, V., & Davidson Devall, K. F (2016). An examination of the EdTPA portfolio assessment and other measures of teacher preparation and readiness. Foreign Language Annals, 49(3), 479-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12209
Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? Information Society, 19(3), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309464
Senior, R. (2010). Connectivity: A framework for understanding effective language teaching in face-to-face and online learning communities. RELC Journal, 41(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210375775
Shabani, K. (2016). Applications of Vygotsky's sociocultural approach for teachers' professional development. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1252177
St. Maurice, H., & Shaw, P. (2004). Teacher portfolios come of age: A preliminary study. NASSP Bulletin, 88, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650408863903
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2015). New skills for online language learning spaces. In R. Hampel & U. Sticker (Eds.), Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices (pp. 63-77). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412263_5
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/coming-crisis-teaching
Swanson, P., & Mason, S. (2018). The world language teacher shortage: Taking a new direction. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12321
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Ziegler, N., & Moeller, A. K. (2012). Increasing self-regulated learning through the LinguaFolio. Foreign Language Annals, 45(3), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01205.x