Item Details

A dialectical reading of Dynamic Systems Theory: Transcending socialized cognition and cognized social dualism in L2 studies

Issue: Vol 3 No. 1 (2016)

Journal: Language and Sociocultural Theory

Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics

DOI: 10.1558/lst.v3i1.27547


Dynamic systems theory (DST) has affordances to be a quintessential metatheoretical architecture for the nuancing of the time-locked mechanisms and processes of the L2 system. The received construal of DST in L2 studies presumes the emergence of structural regularities and the cognitive organization of the L2 system as simply a function of lower-level language use in social milieux. Critiquing some of the bedrock assumptions anchoring the extant reading, this article sketches a complementary dialectical construal of DST. Explicating circular causality, a nexus of causality types, and self-organizational emergence and their attendant implications for an adequate description and explanation of L2 as an emerging, dynamic and complex system are discussed respectively. The article concludes with some interpretive remarks.

Author: Saeed Karimi-Aghdam

View Original Web Page

References :

Baba, K. and Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64 (1), 1–35.

Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C. and Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (1), 1–26.

Bedau, M. A. (1997). Weak emergence. Noûs, 31 (s11), 375–399.

Bunge, M. (1979). Causality and Modern Science. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Cameron, L. and Larsen‐Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 (2), 226–240.

Churchill, E. (2007). A dynamic systems account of learning a word: From ecology to form relations. Applied Linguistics, 29 (3), 339–358.

de Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 166–178.

de Bot, K. (2015). A History of Applied Linguistics: From 1980 to the Present. Abingdon: Routledge.

de Bot, K., Verspoor, M. and Lowie, W. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and applied linguistics: The ultimate ‘so what’? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15 (1), 116–118.

de Bot, K., Lowie W. and Verspoor, M. (2007a). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7–21.

de Bot, K., Lowie W. and Verspoor, M. (2007b). A dynamic view as a complementary perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 51–55.

de Bot, K. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot and W. Lowie (Eds), A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. L. and Verspoor, M. (2013). Dynamic systems theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M. Mayo, M. Gutierrez Mangado and M. Adrián (Eds), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dörnyei. Z., MacIntyre, P. and Henry, A. (Eds) (2015). Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48 (4), 631–664.

Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Ellis, N. C. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 232–249.

Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 558–589.

Gass, S. M. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9 (2), 198–217.

Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1 (1), 49–72.

Gregg, K. R. (2010). Review article: Shallow draughts: Larsen-Freeman and Cameron on complexity. Second Language Research, 26 (4), 549–560.

Herdina, P. and Jessner, U. (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Hohenberger, A. and Peltzer-Karpf, A. (2009). Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems. Linguistics, 47 (2), 481–511.

Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be? Language Learning, 65 (1), 210–231.

Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N. C., Lantolf, J. P., Mackey A. and Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36 (3), 1–61.

Humphreys, P. (2008). Synchronic and diachronic emergence. Minds and Machines, 18 (4), 431–442.

Ilyenkov, E. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow and Pacifica, CA: Progress Publishers.

Jessner, U. (2008). A DST model of multilingualism and the role of metalinguistic awareness. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 270–283.

Karimi-Aghdam, S. (under review). Dialectical dynamic systems theory as a supertheory to second language development: Shifting sands or shifting paradigm?

Karimi-Aghdam, S. and Witherington, D. C. (under review). Explaining emergence through self-organization in L2 development: Is efficient causality enough?

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 141–165.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 590–619.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). On the complementarity of chaos/complexity theory and dynamic systems theory in understanding the second language acquisition process. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 35–37.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). The dynamic co-adaptation of cognitive and social views: A chaos/complexity theory perspective. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Abingdon: Routledge.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012a). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45 (2), 202–214.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012b). Complexity theory. In S. Gass and A. Mackey (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Abingdon: Routledge.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013a). Complexity theory: A new way to think. Revista Brasileira De Linguística Aplicada, 13 (2), 369–373.

Larsen‐Freeman, D. (2013b). Transfer of learning transformed. Language Learning, 63 (s1), 107–129.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). Another step to be taken: Rethinking the endpoint of the interlanguage continuum. In Z-H. Han and E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage: Forty Years Later: 203–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015).Ten lessons from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre and A. Henry (Eds), Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008a). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008b). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 200–213.

Lewis, M. D. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71 (1), 36–43.

Lewis, M. D. (2011). Dynamic systems approaches: Cool enough? Hot enough? Child Development Perspectives, 5 (4), 279–285.

Lowie, W., de Bot, K. and Verspoor, M. (2009). A dynamic view of second language development’. In K. de Bot and R. W. Schrauf (Eds), Language Development over the Lifespan. Abingdon: Routledge.

Lowie, W. and Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic re-evaluation. [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65 (1), 63–88.

Macintyre, P. D. and Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32 (2), 149–171.

Overton, W. F. (1991). The structure of developmental theory. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior. Vol. 23. New York: Academic Press.

Overton, W. F. (2006). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, methodology. In W. Damon and R. M. Lerner (Eds-in-chief) and R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical Models of Human Development (6th Ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

Overton, W. F. (2010). Life-span development: Concepts and issues. In W. F. Overton (Vol. Ed.) and R. M. Lerner (Ed.-in-chief), The Handbook of Life-span Development: Cognition, Biology, and Methods. Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Overton, W. F. (2015). Process, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In Lerner, R. M., Overton, W. F., Molenaar, P. C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Vol. 1, Theory and Method, (7th Ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Overton, W. F. and Ennis, M. D. (2006). Cognitive-developmental and behavior analytic theories: Evolving into complementarity. Human Development, 49, 143–172.

Pepper, S. C. (1942). World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Plaza–Pust, C. (2008). Dynamic systems theory and universal grammar: Holding up a turbulent mirror to development in grammars. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 250–269.

Popper, K. R. (1940). What is dialectic? Mind, 49, 403-26.

Polat, B. and Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35, 184–207.

Schröder, J. (1998). Emergence: Non‐deducibility or downwards causation? The Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 433–452.

Silberstein, M. (2002). Reduction, emergence and explanation. In P. Machamer and M. Silberstein (Eds), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Silberstein, M. and McGeever, J. (1999). The search for ontological emergence. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49, 201–214.

Smith, L. B. and Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (8), 343–348.

Spencer, J. P., Perone, S. and Buss, A. T. (2011). Twenty years and going strong: A dynamic systems revolution in motor and cognitive development. Child Development Perspectives, 5 (4), 260–266.

Spoelman, M. and Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31 (4), 532–553.

Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon (Ed.-in-chief) and R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical Models of Human Development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Thompson, E. and Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5 (10), 418–25.

Van Geert, P. (2000). The dynamics of general developmental mechanisms: From Piaget and Vygotsky to dynamic systems models. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9 (2), 64–68.

Van Geert, P. (2007). Dynamic systems in second language learning: Some general methodological reflections. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 47–49.

Van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 179–199.

Van Geert, P. (2009). A comprehensive dynamic systems theory of language development. In K. de Bot and R. W. Schrauf (Eds), Language Development over the Lifespan. Abingdon: Routledge.

Van Geert, P. and Verspoor, M. (2015). Dynamic systems and language development. In B. McWhinney and W. O'Grady (Eds), The Handbook of Language Emergence. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Verspoor, M., Lowie W. and Van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 214–231.

Verspoor, M., de Bot, K. and Lowie, W. (2011). A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development: Methods and Techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Verspoor, M., Schmid M. S. and Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 239–263.

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller.

Witherington, D. C. (2007). The dynamic systems approach as metatheory for developmental psychology. Human Development, 50 (2), 127–153.

Witherington, D. C. (2011). Taking emergence seriously: The centrality of circular causality for dynamic systems approaches to development. Human Development, 54 (2), 66–92.

Witherington, D. C. (2014). Self-organization and explanatory pluralism: Avoiding the snares of reductionism in developmental science. Research in Human Development, 11 (1), 22–36.